De-Bunking Bushisms
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
The President is in full election year mode. In my estimation, President Bush is like Bill Clinton in that they are both excellent campaigners. The similarities end there, of course. But to invoke Joe Lieberman for a moment, those who underestimate President Bush’s political skills do so at their own peril. That being said, the audio of Bush’s Monday press conference revealed a desperate man. He continues to spew the talking points, but they seem to lack their former (circa 2002, 2004) tone of superiority. His points, as paraphrased below, are now more easily refuted.
We’re fighting them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here. This presumes two things: (1) That our troops are being used as human-bait and (2) that as long as we’re “over there,” the threat is lessened “over here.” The first is deplorable, the second is obviously wrong. Does anyone think extremists are refraining from plotting attacks in America so long as we maintain a troop presence in Iraq? No. At least I hope not.
If you think Iraq is a mess now, it would be far worse if we leave. Not that I’m necessarily advocating an immediate pullout, but I’m not entirely sure this is true either. And who, at this point, trusts the administration’s predictions? I submit that our troop presence may be, in effect, a safety net enabling the sectarian violence. Perhaps our leaving would generate the political motivation to forge a Sunni-Shiite compromise. In any event, a strategic redeployment elsewhere in the region seems to be the best option.
Our enemies are trying to stop the spread of democracy and freedom. This ignores the reality that Hezbollah, Hamas and Ahmadinejad were all freely elected to govern their respective citizens. After witnessing the last 2 Presidential elections in this country, I worry foremost about free elections in this country. Our enemies have a problem with us, not elections. It would behoove us to consider what that problem might be and how we’ll ultimately deal with it -- beyond the indiscriminate killing of Arabs.
Leaving Iraq now would send the wrong message to the people there. Really? If someone were to come into my life and cause untold destruction and chaos….their leaving would be taken by me as the exact right message. I would strongly support their getting the hell out as quickly as possible! Who are we protecting? Shiite death squads? Sunni insurgents? Might our leaving Iraq be the exact message many of its residents are waiting to hear? Maybe? Either way, I don’t count on President Bush to accurately sense the mood or desire of the Iraqi citizenry.
“Nothing!” – President Bush, screaming like a child, in response to a question about what Iraq had to do with 9/11. Actually, he’s right about this. No de-bunk required. And hopefully this clip has already been made into Democratic campaign advertisements.
--Jay
posted by The Angry Progressives @ 3:58 PM,
,
What Do I Really Care About???
Saturday, August 19, 2006
I focus most of my attention on the political dog fighting in this country and so it occasionally is necessary for me to stop and ask myself why I even care. I believe that political operatives get so obsessed with the “game” that they stop caring about real issues. For example, I doubt Karl Rove cares at all about the substance of the Republican agenda. Not that he necessarily should -- his actual job is to get R’s elected. So, until the Democrats hire me to shape party strategy and messaging, I’ll continue to remind myself to care about actual substantive issues. Here are my top 5:
(1) Foreign Policy / Diplomacy. I’m embarrassed to be an American. Iraq has been an absolute fiasco, due in large part to our diplomatic arrogance and a lack of long term, realistic military strategy. I realize I’m stating the obvious. This administration’s ineptitude has bred a whole new generation of fanatic anti-Americanism throughout the world. And for what? We’re not safer. I’m not without hope. I think new leadership in the White House can instill a new tone and repair much of the diplomatic damage. But our policy also must change. I absolutely do not believe in the Bush Doctrine or pre-emption absent a direct, verified threat. Rather than exploit 9/11 to justify invasions of sovereign nations, we should use it as an opportunity to reinvent the military with a focus on intelligence gathering, police work and special ops. We must talk directly to all parties (Iran, North Korea, and Syria) whose policy we wish to influence. It’s beyond arrogant to insist someone change without speaking to them. This amounts to a humble approach to foreign policy. Humility requires patience, listening, compromise and flexibility. I don’t think we need to sacrifice our interests or our safety.
(2) Adjusting to the Global Economy. I understand that the global economy is a reality we can’t escape. I think progressives have the opportunity to seize the debate regarding how we, as a nation, adjust to it (because Republicans generally don’t care). I like my colleague’s idea regarding massive investment in alternate energy and stem cell research. That would seem to create additional skilled jobs. I also highly advocate incorporating labor standards into our trade agreements. I’m not sure if this would change anything at home, but it’s a moral issue and it can’t hurt workers here. I support investment in worker retraining. More teachers, more social workers (see # 3).
(3) Treating Addiction and Mental Illness. I support a massive overhaul of our criminal justice system because I think we’ve stopped attempting rehabilitation. Deterrence is one small way to fight crime and probably the least effective at discouraging recidivism. I believe we need to equip our prisons with top notch substance abuse treatment and mental health care facilities. I support funding for transitional housing. I’m not per se opposed to faith-based initiatives, but we need transparency in funding allocation so that the programs aren’t used as political pay offs. As a side note, I oppose the death penalty in all circumstances.
(4) Children’s Health Care / Public Health. First of all, I believe we should cover the basic needs of all children immediately. I would like to see an investment in preventative health care through better physical education at schools and in the media. We have embraced a sedentary life style (myself included), and it plays right into the hands of the drug companies. I’m worried that big business has hijacked the health care agenda in this country and I’m not sure that socialized health care would solve the real problem. Therefore, I don’t necessarily support a single payer system. As a first step, let’s roll back the tax breaks and business protections for drug companies and focus our attention on health issues like better parks and walkable communities. And, of course, cover all kids right now.
(5) Urban Redevelopment. It’s awfully sad to ride the train from Philadelphia to Trenton to New York and see all the old bombed out factories and desolate neighborhoods. Think of the money we’re spending in Iraq in light of the desperate needs of our neighborhoods here. It’s stupefying. I’m for federal money being spent on additional empowerment zones, specifically targeting neighborhoods outside the central business districts in major cities. Consider it phase II of the early 90’s urban renewal. Give people a reason to move back. Beyond new construction, there’s simply a need to clear out these old, depressing, probably dangerous buildings. In America, we’ve long valued aesthetics. All our citizens deserve clean and cared for neighborhoods to live in.
Applicable to all of the above are a robust environmental policy, dedication to mass transit, dedication to smart growth and walkable communities.
--Jay
posted by The Angry Progressives @ 2:32 PM,
,
